Signposting additional curriculum sequences

We want to consider how we may best support teachers to explore and learn from other high quality sequences, by signposting them from Oak's online products. Your valuable feedback will inform the development of our approach.

Please refer to our Signposting additional curriculum sequences document as needed.

Name*

Job title

Organisation/school

Email*

Your role

Do you represent an organisation that may be interested in having your curriculum sequence signposted on Oak's platform?

Yes

Of the high-level models outlined in the document, which is your preferred approach?

Do you have any comments or further suggestions on your preferred model?

How many additional curriculum sequences should we signpost to in each subject?

If we proceed with a threshold approach (Option 2), do you have any comments on the proposed criteria suggested for assessment (page 6)?

If we proceed with a detailed assessment (Option 3), do you have any comments on the parameters and criteria suggested for assessment (page 7)?

Should any assessment criteria be judged against Oak’s curriculum principles and subject principles? Or should we lean towards different criteria in order to promote different curriculum approaches? If the latter, please provide suggestions.

Do you have any views on who should complete any assessment?

Do you agree with a proposed three-year limit for hosting sequences before re-assessment?

Yes

Please add any comments on the proposed three-year limit for hosting sequences before re-assessment.

Do you have any views on which subjects should we initially trial this approach in, alongside maths?

Do you have any other comments on Oak signposting additional curricula?